Choose a research task

Compare investigation, consultation, warnings, appeal, and reasonableness patterns across selected tribunal decisions.

Output

Process-focused research memo with a comparable-decision matrix, ACAS context and source-check caveats.

Not for

Outcome predictionFinal case conclusionUnchecked witness evidence

Structure adjustment requests, knowledge, occupational health evidence, implementation delay, and comparator reasoning.

Output

Evidence-gap memo organised around knowledge, adjustment specificity, implementation delay and source caveats.

Not for

Diagnosing disability statusReplacing medical evidenceOutcome prediction

Review protected disclosure, causation, detriment, chronology, and employer explanation patterns without predicting outcome.

Output

Chronology-led memo separating disclosure status, alleged detriment, employer explanation and causation caution.

Not for

Assuming disclosure statusCausation predictionUnreviewed chronology

Inspect ACAS Code and guidance passages beside selected ET decisions while keeping guidance separate from tribunal comparables.

Output

Lens brief showing promoted guidance passages beside selected tribunal reasoning with source-family labels preserved.

Not for

Treating guidance as a tribunal findingReplacing current source checksOutcome prediction

Compare remedy reasoning, compensation headings, mitigation, reductions, and award signals across source decisions.

Output

Matrix-led remedy research note comparing reasoning patterns while marking evidence gaps and award caution.

Not for

Award predictionTariff-style estimatesUnchecked loss evidence