Best used for
Adjustment requestsKnowledge and evidenceImplementation delay
Disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments
Structure adjustment requests, knowledge, occupational health evidence, implementation delay, and comparator reasoning.
Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.
When to use this workflow
Not for
Diagnosing disability statusReplacing medical evidenceOutcome prediction
Output
Evidence-gap memo organised around knowledge, adjustment specificity, implementation delay and source caveats.
Source inputs
Sources for this workflow
Examples are illustrative. Workspace output uses your selected decisions and promoted Lens passages.
Adjustment chronologyOccupational-health evidenceSelected ET comparablesStatutory Lens context
Source trail
Reasonable adjustments source trail example
Check what each source supports before using memo wording.
Scroll horizontally to see the source details and checks.
| Ref | Source layer | Research role | Source details | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to compare when the employer knew enough to consider adjustments and whether the request was specific. | Confirm the source chronology and the tribunal's treatment of knowledge, medical evidence, and employee communications. |
| S2 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to inspect whether delay was explained by operational evidence, uncertainty, or lack of follow-up. | Check whether the adjustment was practical, trialled, rejected, or simply left unresolved. |
| S3 | ET decision | Distinguishing or adverse comparable | Used to test whether the requested or recommended adjustment was concrete enough to compare and whether feasibility evidence was available. | Avoid treating a broad concern as equivalent to a specific workplace step. Check what was requested, trialled, rejected or left unclear. |
| L1 | Statute Lens | Legal-framework context | Used to keep the statutory framework visible without turning the sample into legal advice. | Verify the current statutory text and any authority needed for the specific professional question. |
Workflow steps
01
Summarise the asserted impairment, knowledge, and adjustment history.
02
Find ET decisions discussing similar barriers and workplace steps.
03
Separate statutory context from fact-pattern comparables.
04
Draft a research memo with uncertainty and evidence-gap notes.
Example research question
Which comparable decisions discuss delayed reasonable adjustments after occupational health recommendations?
Explore the sample
No workspace access required.