Best used for
Award signalsMitigationRemedy reasoning
Remedy and award comparison
Compare remedy reasoning, compensation headings, mitigation, reductions, and award signals across source decisions.
Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.
When to use this workflow
Not for
Award predictionTariff-style estimatesUnchecked loss evidence
Output
Matrix-led remedy research note comparing reasoning patterns while marking evidence gaps and award caution.
Source inputs
Sources for this workflow
Examples are illustrative. Workspace output uses your selected decisions and promoted Lens passages.
Remedy questionLoss and mitigation evidenceSelected remedy decisionsReduction reasoning comparables
Source trail
Remedy comparison source trail example
Check what each source supports before using memo wording.
Scroll horizontally to see the source details and checks.
| Ref | Source layer | Research role | Source details | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to inspect how a tribunal discussed loss evidence and mitigation steps. | Check the dates, earnings evidence, mitigation findings, and whether the remedy context is genuinely comparable. |
| S2 | ET decision | Comparable or distinguishing remedy source | Used to compare how tribunals discuss reduction-style reasoning without turning that discussion into a forecast. | Confirm the type of reduction, factual basis, and how the tribunal explained discretion. |
| S3 | ET decision | Adverse or cautionary comparable | Used to show where remedy analysis turns on missing documents, earnings evidence, or unsupported loss claims. | Check whether the tribunal rejected evidence because of credibility, documentation, causation, or dates. |
Workflow steps
01
Identify the remedy question and decision types.
02
Search for decisions with similar remedy issues.
03
Inspect comparable and distinguishable award reasoning.
04
Draft a matrix-led memo with source caveats.
Example research question
How have tribunals discussed compensation, mitigation, and reductions in comparable unfair dismissal decisions?
Explore the sample
No workspace access required.